[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120823092405.GB32710@amt.cnet>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 06:24:05 -0300
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: trace the events of mmu_notifier
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 05:51:35PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> mmu_notifier is the interface to broadcast the mm events to KVM, the
> tracepoints introduced in this patch can trace all these events, it is
> very helpful for us to notice and fix the bug caused by mm
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> include/trace/events/kvm.h | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 19 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/kvm.h b/include/trace/events/kvm.h
> index 7ef9e75..a855ff9 100644
> --- a/include/trace/events/kvm.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/kvm.h
> @@ -309,6 +309,127 @@ TRACE_EVENT(
>
> #endif
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER) && defined(KVM_ARCH_WANT_MMU_NOTIFIER)
> +DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(mmu_notifier_address_class,
> +
> + TP_PROTO(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long address),
> +
> + TP_ARGS(kvm, address),
> +
> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> + __field(struct kvm *, kvm)
> + __field(unsigned long, address)
> + ),
> +
> + TP_fast_assign(
> + __entry->kvm = kvm;
> + __entry->address = address;
> + ),
> +
> + TP_printk("kvm %p address %lx", __entry->kvm, __entry->address)
Perhaps the pointer was useful for debugging, but otherwise, i don't
think it should be printed.
> + TP_ARGS(kvm, address, pte),
> +
> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> + __field(struct kvm *, kvm)
> + __field(unsigned long, address)
> + __field(unsigned long, pte)
> + ),
> +
> + TP_fast_assign(
> + __entry->kvm = kvm;
> + __entry->address = address;
> + __entry->pte = pte.pte;
> + ),
> +
> + TP_printk("kvm %p address %lx pte %lx", __entry->kvm, __entry->address,
> + __entry->pte)
The pte bits can be spelled out? (see __print_symbolic).
> spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>
> + trace_kvm_mmu_notifier_clear_flush_young(kvm, address);
> +
> young = kvm_age_hva(kvm, address);
> if (young)
> kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
> @@ -394,6 +407,9 @@ static int kvm_mmu_notifier_test_young(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
>
> idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
> spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> +
> + trace_kvm_mmu_notifier_test_young(kvm, address);
> +
can print young information?
> young = kvm_test_age_hva(kvm, address);
> spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
> @@ -408,6 +424,9 @@ static void kvm_mmu_notifier_release(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
> int idx;
>
> idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
> +
> + trace_kvm_mmu_notifier_release(kvm);
> +
> kvm_arch_flush_shadow(kvm);
> srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
> }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists