linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/6] ARM: omap: allow building omap44xx without SMP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201208231212.04869.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Thu, 23 Aug 2012 12:12:04 +0000
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	"Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] ARM: omap: allow building omap44xx without SMP

On Thursday 23 August 2012, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
> I see your point but alternate patch is pushing down the fix to the low
> level driver and that means you end up patching more drivers when they
> use COUPLE idle infrastructure. That was the only reason I was thinking
> of suppressing the error at the source.
> 
> Since it is just for the random builds and actually doesn't impact the real
> functionality as such, I am fine with your proposed patch too.

Ok. It would be nice of course to test if this actually works on uniprocessor
configurations.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/