[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMQu2gzPMkbDvTfTOZVp+Qh=2=AHOuyt4NXtxAps=RmMF+mf6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:30:18 +0530
From: "Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] ARM: omap: allow building omap44xx without SMP
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> On Thursday 23 August 2012, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
> > I see your point but alternate patch is pushing down the fix to the low
> > level driver and that means you end up patching more drivers when they
> > use COUPLE idle infrastructure. That was the only reason I was thinking
> > of suppressing the error at the source.
> >
> > Since it is just for the random builds and actually doesn't impact the
> > real
> > functionality as such, I am fine with your proposed patch too.
>
> Ok. It would be nice of course to test if this actually works on
> uniprocessor
> configurations.
>
Have tested the patch and it does boot with UP build on OMAP.
Acked-tested-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists