[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874nnpwxxl.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp>
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 23:05:42 +0900
From: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
To: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Amit Sahrawat <amit.sahrawat83@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] fat: simplify writeback_inode function.
Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com> writes:
> Simplify writeback_inode function.
Looks cleanup without logic change.
Acked-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
> Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Sahrawat <amit.sahrawat83@...il.com>
> ---
> fs/fat/inode.c | 14 +++++---------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fat/inode.c b/fs/fat/inode.c
> index 973296b..4bbb24e 100644
> --- a/fs/fat/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/fat/inode.c
> @@ -1457,18 +1457,14 @@ static int writeback_inode(struct inode *inode)
> {
>
> int ret;
> - struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping;
> - struct writeback_control wbc = {
> - .sync_mode = WB_SYNC_NONE,
> - .nr_to_write = 0,
> - };
> - /* if we used WB_SYNC_ALL, sync_inode waits for the io for the
> - * inode to finish. So WB_SYNC_NONE is sent down to sync_inode
> +
> + /* if we used wait=1, sync_inode_metadata waits for the io for the
> + * inode to finish. So wait=0 is sent down to sync_inode_metadata
> * and filemap_fdatawrite is used for the data blocks
> */
> - ret = sync_inode(inode, &wbc);
> + ret = sync_inode_metadata(inode, 0);
> if (!ret)
> - ret = filemap_fdatawrite(mapping);
> + ret = filemap_fdatawrite(inode->i_mapping);
> return ret;
> }
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists