[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <503BDE58.60101@suse.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:53:44 -0400
From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>
To: Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linux Kernel Maling List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...com>,
Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...hat.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...com>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk.h: Fix shim ifdef guard (HAVE_CLK -> COMMON_CLK)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 8/27/12 2:52 PM, Russell King wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:28:15AM -0400, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
>> Commit 93abe8e4 (clk: add non HAVE_CLK routines) added shims for
>> the clk code but HAVE_CLK isn't enough. It's possible to have
>> the clk support but not enable it. We end up with full prototypes
>> for code that is never built - causing module linking to fail
>> later.
>>
>> This patch changes the guard to use COMMON_CLK, which actually
>> guards the code.
>
> This is wrong. COMMON_CLK is an _implementation_ of the CLK API.
> It is not the only implementation in the kernel. Conditionalizing
> like this breaks existing users.
>
> HAVE_CLK is the right thing here - if you define HAVE_CLK then you
> _are_ providing an implementation of clk_get() et.al. If you're
> not, then you do not define HAVE_CLK. Simples.
>
Ok. Thanks for the feedback.
It would seem, then, that the powerpc clock implementation doesn't
implement the full API and that's where we're running into problems.
Specifically, the use of clk_devm_get in
drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_imx.c and
drivers/char/hw_random/exynos-rng.ko is causing module link errors on
powerpc configs for the EFIKA hardware. The EXYNOS RNG driver should
probably have a dependency on ARCH_EXYNOS. The chipidea driver looks
like it was developed on ARM hardware - does it exist anywhere else?
Should the clk_devm stuff be moved someplace generic? I don't have a
horse in this race. My only interest here is to get these configs to
build again. :)
- -Jeff
- --
Jeff Mahoney
SUSE Labs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=/UyR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists