[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120828172336.GA25749@google.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 10:23:36 -0700
From: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dm-devel@...hat.com, tj@...nel.org, vgoyal@...hat.com,
mpatocka@...hat.com, bharrosh@...asas.com,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/13] block: Add an explicit bio flag for bios that
own their bvec
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:00:38PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:22:41PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 08:43:52PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:04:05AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > > >...
> > > > --- a/include/linux/blk_types.h
> > > > +++ b/include/linux/blk_types.h
> > > > @@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ struct bio {
> > > > * BIO_POOL_IDX()
> > > > */
> > > > #define BIO_RESET_BITS 12
> > > > +#define BIO_OWNS_VEC 12 /* bio_free() should free bvec */
> > > >...
> > >
> > > This doesn't look right.
> >
> > Well, the first 12 bits are reset, so bit 12 will get preserved... I
> > guess it's unusual to have a duplicated enum value like that but
> > BIO_RESET_BITS is just a marker, not a real bit.
>
> Wouldn't a BIO_RESET_MASK be better than BIO_RESET_BITS?
Ehh... Might be good to have BIO_RESET_MASK too, but we really want
BIO_RESET_BITS with the flags as that makes it explicit which flags get
cleared and which don't. At first I was going to add BIO_RESET_MASK too,
but it just seemed to get ugly and verbose and didn't fit nicely
anywhere, so I'm dithering and not doing anything with it for now.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists