[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1346174930.2296.13.camel@laptop>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 19:28:50 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, dhowells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: lockdep trace from posix timers
On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 19:01 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > struct callback_head *
> > task_work_cancel(struct task_struct *task, task_work_func_t func)
> > {
> > + struct callback_head **workp, *work;
> > +
> > +again:
> > + workp = &task->task_works;
> > + work = *workp;
> > + while (work) {
> > + if (work->func == func) {
>
> But you can't dereference this pointer. Without some locking this
> can race with another task_work_cancel() or task_work_run(), this
> work can be free/unmapped/reused.
>
> > + if (cmpxchg(workp, work, work->next) == work)
> > + return work;
>
> Or this can race with task_work_cancel(work) + task_work_add(work).
> cmpxchg() can succeed even if work->func is already different.
Bah.. you and your races ;-)
Surely we can do this locklessly.. I'll go try harder still.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists