lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALKntY02CougnJLANeZwgqB0W8qch2DLN13BYU=j+ooAgji1AQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 28 Aug 2012 13:15:27 -0700
From:	Xin Tong <xerox.time.tech@...il.com>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: changing timeslice in linux

i changed the TIMESLICE defined in the sched.c

  109 /*
  110  * These are the 'tuning knobs' of the scheduler:
  111  *
  112  * default timeslice is 100 msecs (used only for SCHED_RR tasks).
  113  * Timeslices get refilled after they expire.
  114  */
  115 #define DEF_TIMESLICE           (20 * HZ / 1000)


I compiled and installed the modified kernel, but when i looked at the
, i get a different number

root@elm:~# cat /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_period_us
1000000


Xin

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 07:51:52 -0700, Xin Tong wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2012-08-19 at 11:58 -0700, Xin Tong wrote:
>>>> I have 2 questions about linux 2.6 x86_64 scheduler.
>>>>
>>>> 1. is the default scheduling algorithm SCHED_NORMAL in linux ?
>>>
>>> Yes.
>> Is there any document describing what the sched_normal is ? it is more
>> difficult than SCHED_RR to infer its meaning just based on its name ?
>>>
>>>> 2. how do i change the time slice in linux source code ?
>>>
>>> You shouldn't need to.  You can tune "slice" by adjusting
>>> sched_latency_ns and sched_min_granularity_ns, but note that "slice" is
>>> not a fixed quantum.  Also note that CFS preemption decisions are based
>>> upon instantaneous state.  A task may have received a full (variable)
>>> "slice" of CPU time, but preemption will be triggered only if a more
>>> deserving task is available, so a "slice" is not the "max uninterrupted
>>> CPU time" that you may expect it to be.. but it is somewhat similar.
>>>
>>> -Mike
>>>
>> This can be done without recompiling and reinstalling the kernel ?
>> maybe one simply needs to write to a device file under /dev ?
>
> You can find those files under /proc/sys/kernel/.
>
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ