[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALKntY0WgYBPfJ0aG=oqLctJf-EOmAdKBWqnA64x8p9tdVQDXA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 13:16:47 -0700
From: Xin Tong <xerox.time.tech@...il.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: changing timeslice in linux
another question is that when i try to launch many (24) RT processes.
some of them do not seem to get scheduled. i query their scheduling
properties. they all have SCHED_RR with priority 99, but some of them
simply are not taking any CPU.
Xin
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Xin Tong <xerox.time.tech@...il.com> wrote:
> i changed the TIMESLICE defined in the sched.c
>
> 109 /*
> 110 * These are the 'tuning knobs' of the scheduler:
> 111 *
> 112 * default timeslice is 100 msecs (used only for SCHED_RR tasks).
> 113 * Timeslices get refilled after they expire.
> 114 */
> 115 #define DEF_TIMESLICE (20 * HZ / 1000)
>
>
> I compiled and installed the modified kernel, but when i looked at the
> , i get a different number
>
> root@elm:~# cat /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_period_us
> 1000000
>
>
> Xin
>
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 07:51:52 -0700, Xin Tong wrote:
>>> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 2012-08-19 at 11:58 -0700, Xin Tong wrote:
>>>>> I have 2 questions about linux 2.6 x86_64 scheduler.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. is the default scheduling algorithm SCHED_NORMAL in linux ?
>>>>
>>>> Yes.
>>> Is there any document describing what the sched_normal is ? it is more
>>> difficult than SCHED_RR to infer its meaning just based on its name ?
>>>>
>>>>> 2. how do i change the time slice in linux source code ?
>>>>
>>>> You shouldn't need to. You can tune "slice" by adjusting
>>>> sched_latency_ns and sched_min_granularity_ns, but note that "slice" is
>>>> not a fixed quantum. Also note that CFS preemption decisions are based
>>>> upon instantaneous state. A task may have received a full (variable)
>>>> "slice" of CPU time, but preemption will be triggered only if a more
>>>> deserving task is available, so a "slice" is not the "max uninterrupted
>>>> CPU time" that you may expect it to be.. but it is somewhat similar.
>>>>
>>>> -Mike
>>>>
>>> This can be done without recompiling and reinstalling the kernel ?
>>> maybe one simply needs to write to a device file under /dev ?
>>
>> You can find those files under /proc/sys/kernel/.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists