lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1346421558.9709.51.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 31 Aug 2012 16:59:18 +0300
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To:	Huang Shijie <shijie8@...il.com>
Cc:	dwmw2@...radead.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shmulik.ladkani@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mtd: cmdlinepart: sort the unsorted partitions

On Sun, 2012-08-26 at 13:21 -0400, Huang Shijie wrote:
> Assume we have a 1GB(8Gb) nand chip.
> It is legit if we set the partitions as the following:
>     gpmi-nand:1g@...m(rootfs),100m@0(boot),100m@...m(kernel)
> 
> But the current code can not parse out any partition with this
> cmdline.
> 
> This patch sorts the unsorted partitions by the @offset.
> For there are maybe only several partitions, i use the simple
> Bubble sort algorithm.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie <shijie8@...il.com>

I still cannot find time to actually think about this carefully, but the
commit message does not sound convincing, it does not explain why
sorting is the right way to fix the issue, and what would be the
alternatives. It actually also does not explain why exactly we currently
cannot parse the example string.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ