linux-kernel - Re: CMA page migration failure due to buffers on bh

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <504122BE.8080706@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Fri, 31 Aug 2012 13:46:54 -0700
From:	Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>
To:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
CC:	linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
	"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: CMA page migration failure due to buffers on bh_lru

On 8/29/2012 6:03 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:

> My quick and dirty workaround for testing is to remove the GFP_MOVABLE
> flag from find_or_create_page but this seems significantly less than
> optimal. Ideally, it seems like the buffers should be evicted from the
> LRU when trying to drop (expand on invalid_bh_lru?) but I'm not familiar
> enough with the code path to know if this is a good approach.
>
> Any suggestions/feedback is appreciated. Thanks.
>
> Laura

I came up with what I think is a reasonable fix to this. Feedback is 
appreciated. Thanks.

Laura


8<---

diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
index ad5938c..daa0c3d 100644
--- a/fs/buffer.c
+++ b/fs/buffer.c
@@ -1399,12 +1399,49 @@ static bool has_bh_in_lru(int cpu, void *dummy)
  	return 0;
  }

+static void __evict_bh_lru(void *arg)
+{
+	struct bh_lru *b = &get_cpu_var(bh_lrus);
+	struct buffer_head *bh = arg;
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < BH_LRU_SIZE; i++) {
+		if (b->bhs[i] == bh) {
+			brelse(b->bhs[i]);
+			b->bhs[i] = NULL;
+			goto out;
+		}
+	}
+out:
+	put_cpu_var(bh_lrus);
+}
+
+static bool bh_exists_in_lru(int cpu, void *arg)
+{
+	struct bh_lru *b = per_cpu_ptr(&bh_lrus, cpu);
+	struct buffer_head *bh = arg;
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < BH_LRU_SIZE; i++) {
+		if (b->bhs[i] == bh)
+			return 1;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+
+}
  void invalidate_bh_lrus(void)
  {
  	on_each_cpu_cond(has_bh_in_lru, invalidate_bh_lru, NULL, 1, GFP_KERNEL);
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(invalidate_bh_lrus);

+void evict_bh_lrus(struct buffer_head *bh)
+{
+	on_each_cpu_cond(bh_exists_in_lru, __evict_bh_lru, bh, 1, GFP_ATOMIC);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(evict_bh_lrus);
+
  void set_bh_page(struct buffer_head *bh,
  		struct page *page, unsigned long offset)
  {
@@ -3052,6 +3089,7 @@ drop_buffers(struct page *page, struct buffer_head 
**buffers_to_free)

  	bh = head;
  	do {
+		evict_bh_lrus(bh);
  		if (buffer_write_io_error(bh) && page->mapping)
  			set_bit(AS_EIO, &page->mapping->flags);
  		if (buffer_busy(bh))
-- 

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/