lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120831134956.fec0f681.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 31 Aug 2012 13:49:56 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	wency@...fujitsu.com
Cc:	x86@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, cmetcalf@...era.com,
	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, rientjes@...gle.com, liuj97@...il.com,
	len.brown@...el.com, benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
	cl@...ux.com, minchan.kim@...il.com,
	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v8 PATCH 00/20] memory-hotplug: hot-remove physical memory

On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 18:00:07 +0800
wency@...fujitsu.com wrote:

> This patch series aims to support physical memory hot-remove.

Have you had much review and testing feedback yet?

> The patches can free/remove the following things:
> 
>   - acpi_memory_info                          : [RFC PATCH 4/19]
>   - /sys/firmware/memmap/X/{end, start, type} : [RFC PATCH 8/19]
>   - iomem_resource                            : [RFC PATCH 9/19]
>   - mem_section and related sysfs files       : [RFC PATCH 10-11, 13-16/19]
>   - page table of removed memory              : [RFC PATCH 12/19]
>   - node and related sysfs files              : [RFC PATCH 18-19/19]
> 
> If you find lack of function for physical memory hot-remove, please let me
> know.

I doubt if many people have hardware which permits physical memory
removal?  How would you suggest that people with regular hardware can
test these chagnes?

> Known problems:
> 1. memory can't be offlined when CONFIG_MEMCG is selected.

That's quite a problem!  Do you have a description of why this is the
case, and a plan for fixing it?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ