| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <50447388.4080609@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 17:08:24 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
dhowells@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, sbw@....edu, patches@...aro.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/23] rcu: Provide OOM handler to motivate
lazy RCU callbacks
On 08/31/2012 02:18 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>
>
> In kernels built with CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ=y, CPUs can accumulate a
> large number of lazy callbacks, which as the name implies will be slow
> to be invoked. This can be a problem on small-memory systems, where the
> default 6-second sleep for CPUs having only lazy RCU callbacks could well
> be fatal. This commit therefore installs an OOM hander that ensures that
> every CPU with non-lazy callbacks has at least one non-lazy callback,
> in turn ensuring timely advancement for these callbacks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
> ---
> kernel/rcutree.h | 5 ++-
> kernel/rcutree_plugin.h | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.h b/kernel/rcutree.h
> index 117a150..effb273 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree.h
> @@ -315,8 +315,11 @@ struct rcu_data {
> unsigned long n_rp_need_fqs;
> unsigned long n_rp_need_nothing;
>
> - /* 6) _rcu_barrier() callback. */
> + /* 6) _rcu_barrier() and OOM callbacks. */
> struct rcu_head barrier_head;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ
> + struct rcu_head oom_head;
> +#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ */
>
> int cpu;
> struct rcu_state *rsp;
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> index 7f3244c..bac8cc1 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/oom.h>
>
> #define RCU_KTHREAD_PRIO 1
>
> @@ -2112,6 +2113,85 @@ static void rcu_idle_count_callbacks_posted(void)
> __this_cpu_add(rcu_dynticks.nonlazy_posted, 1);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Data for flushing lazy RCU callbacks at OOM time.
> + */
> +static atomic_t oom_callback_count;
> +static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(oom_callback_wq);
> +
> +/*
> + * RCU OOM callback -- decrement the outstanding count and deliver the
> + * wake-up if we are the last one.
> + */
> +static void rcu_oom_callback(struct rcu_head *rhp)
> +{
> + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&oom_callback_count))
> + wake_up(&oom_callback_wq);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Post an rcu_oom_notify callback on the current CPU if it has at
> + * least one lazy callback. This will unnecessarily post callbacks
> + * to CPUs that already have a non-lazy callback at the end of their
> + * callback list, but this is an infrequent operation, so accept some
> + * extra overhead to keep things simple.
> + */
> +static void rcu_oom_notify_cpu(void *flavor)
> +{
> + struct rcu_state *rsp = flavor;
> + struct rcu_data *rdp = __this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
> +
> + if (rdp->qlen_lazy != 0) {
> + atomic_inc(&oom_callback_count);
> + rsp->call(&rdp->oom_head, rcu_oom_callback);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * If low on memory, ensure that each CPU has a non-lazy callback.
> + * This will wake up CPUs that have only lazy callbacks, in turn
> + * ensuring that they free up the corresponding memory in a timely manner.
> + */
> +static int rcu_oom_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
> + unsigned long notused, void *nfreed)
> +{
> + int cpu;
> + struct rcu_state *rsp;
> +
> + /* Wait for callbacks from earlier instance to complete. */
> + wait_event(oom_callback_wq, atomic_read(&oom_callback_count) == 0);
> +
> + /*
> + * Prevent premature wakeup: ensure that all increments happen
> + * before there is a chance of the counter reaching zero.
> + */
> + atomic_set(&oom_callback_count, 1);
> +
> + get_online_cpus();
> + for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
> + for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp)
> + smp_call_function_single(cpu, rcu_oom_notify_cpu,
> + rsp, 1);
> + put_online_cpus();
> +
> + /* Unconditionally decrement: no need to wake ourselves up. */
> + atomic_dec(&oom_callback_count);
> +
> + *(unsigned long *)nfreed = 1;
Hi, Paul
If you consider the above code has free some memory,
you should use *(unsigned long *)nfreed = +1.
^^
And your code disable OOM actually, because it transfer *nfreed to NON-ZERO
unconditionally.
I did not review the patch nor the whole series carefully.
And if it is possible, could you share the code with rcu_barrier()?
Thanks,
Lai
> + return NOTIFY_OK;
> +}
> +
> +static struct notifier_block rcu_oom_nb = {
> + .notifier_call = rcu_oom_notify
> +};
> +
> +static int __init rcu_register_oom_notifier(void)
> +{
> + register_oom_notifier(&rcu_oom_nb);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +early_initcall(rcu_register_oom_notifier);
> +
> #endif /* #else #if !defined(CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ) */
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists