[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1346686954.2391.13.camel@pizza.hi.pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 17:42:34 +0200
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@...escale.com>,
Huang Shijie <shijie8@...il.com>,
Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@...aro.org>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Add device tree support for on-chip SRAM
Hi Shawn,
Am Montag, den 03.09.2012, 09:53 +0800 schrieb Shawn Guo:
> I do not understand the point of introducing those imx patches, 1 ~ 4
> and 7, 8. They are all unnecessary churns to me. IMO, 4 patches are
> enough.
>
> * genalloc: add a global pool list, allow to find pools by phys address
> * misc: Generic on-chip SRAM allocation driver
> * ARM i.MX: remove IRAM_ALLOC facility
> * ARM: dts: add sram for imx53 and imx6q
>
> Regards,
> Shawn
Thanks, I thought that first making the iram_alloc API work would
decouple this a bit from the coda vpu patches that depend on sram
support on imx53/6q. I'll work in your comments and reduce the patch
count as you propose.
regards
Philipp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists