[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1346822564.18428.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 07:22:44 +0200
From: Maciek Borzecki <maciek.borzecki@...il.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: allow user to indicate path to objdump in command
line
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 12:11 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 10:05 -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> > On 9/4/12 4:32 AM, Maciek Borzecki wrote:
> > > When analyzing perf data from hosts of other architecture than one of the local
> > > host it's useful to call objdump that is part of a toolchain for that
> > > architecture. Instead of calling regular objdump, call one that user specified
> > > in command line.
> >
> > Why not set the PATH to make the toolchain's version the one used by perf?
>
> At least one reason is that cross toolchains are usually built such that
> the resulting binaries are called <target>-objdump, <target>-gcc etc.
Correct, PATH won't work. First I thought, why not hardcode objdump
based on CROSS. But then, I'd need to rebuild perf for each toolchain,
bad idea.
Passing objdump in command line seems like a good compromise to me,
especially as I haven't noticed any other binutils tools to be used by
perf same way as objdump is.
--
Maciek Borzecki <maciek.borzecki@...il.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists