[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1346822819.2257.49.camel@pasglop>
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 15:26:59 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: ananth@...ibm.com
Cc: ppcdev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
peterz@...radead.org, michael@...erman.id.au,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, oleg@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] powerpc: Uprobes port to powerpc
On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 13:01 +0530, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote:
> From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>
>
> This is the port of uprobes to powerpc. Usage is similar to x86.
Guys, can you do a minimum of build testing ?
This one breaks due to uprobe_get_swbp_addr() being defined in both
asm and include/linux when CONFIG_UPROBE isn't set. You don't need
to define it at all in fact, the generic code takes care of both the
declaration for CONFIG_UPROBE and the empty inline for !CONFIG_UPROBE.
I'm fixing that one up myself but please, please, get yourself a test
build script or something to make sure you don't at least break the
build when the stuff you're adding isn't enabled (among others).
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists