| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20120906140416.GG28778@vostochny.stro.at>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 14:04:16 +0000
From: maximilian attems <max@...o.at>
To: Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen@...com.com>
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
Linux Kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] builddeb: remove unneeded explicit Architecture
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 02:00:04PM +0000, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 08:26:05PM +0000, maximilian attems wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 07:40:09PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > >
> > > $ grep CROSS_COMPILE .config
> > > CONFIG_CROSS_COMPILE="arm-linux-gnueabihf-"
> > >
> > > Command:
> > >
> > > KBUILD_DEBARCH=armhf make ARCH=arm KBUILD_IMAGE=uImage deb-pkg
> > >
> > > Error I get:
> > >
> > > dpkg-gencontrol: error: current host architecture 'armhf' does not
> > > appear in package's architecture list (amd64)
> > >
> > > It seems I have to use KBUILD_DEBARCH, as the kernel build system can't
> > > really tell if I want armel or armhf (If I built the same kernel for a
> > > Squeeze system I would have been forced to use armel).
> >
> > well, obviously the dpkg call in
> > -arch=$(dpkg --print-architecture)
> > is wrong please fix that.
> >
>
> care to test belows:
>
without a useless snippet about the lost forcearch v2:
>From f78afbe0b7fa7c49656f4ed1cf404e915f3c325b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: maximilian attems <max@...o.at>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 15:22:02 +0200
Subject: [PATCH v2] deb-pkg: Simplify architecture matching for cross building
No point in invoking dpkg to get the archticture of the host
we build on. Instead directly use the logic implemented
in create_package(). No need anymore to override arch.
While at it fix the linux images to be for the specific
built arch.
Signed-off-by: maximilian attems <max@...o.at>
---
scripts/package/builddeb | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/package/builddeb b/scripts/package/builddeb
index acb8650..a5f197b 100644
--- a/scripts/package/builddeb
+++ b/scripts/package/builddeb
@@ -25,44 +25,8 @@ create_package() {
chown -R root:root "$pdir"
chmod -R go-w "$pdir"
- # Attempt to find the correct Debian architecture
- local forcearch="" debarch=""
- case "$UTS_MACHINE" in
- i386|ia64|alpha)
- debarch="$UTS_MACHINE" ;;
- x86_64)
- debarch=amd64 ;;
- sparc*)
- debarch=sparc ;;
- s390*)
- debarch=s390 ;;
- ppc*)
- debarch=powerpc ;;
- parisc*)
- debarch=hppa ;;
- mips*)
- debarch=mips$(grep -q CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN=y .config && echo el) ;;
- arm*)
- debarch=arm$(grep -q CONFIG_AEABI=y .config && echo el) ;;
- *)
- echo "" >&2
- echo "** ** ** WARNING ** ** **" >&2
- echo "" >&2
- echo "Your architecture doesn't have it's equivalent" >&2
- echo "Debian userspace architecture defined!" >&2
- echo "Falling back to using your current userspace instead!" >&2
- echo "Please add support for $UTS_MACHINE to ${0} ..." >&2
- echo "" >&2
- esac
- if [ -n "$KBUILD_DEBARCH" ] ; then
- debarch="$KBUILD_DEBARCH"
- fi
- if [ -n "$debarch" ] ; then
- forcearch="-DArchitecture=$debarch"
- fi
-
# Create the package
- dpkg-gencontrol -isp $forcearch -p$pname -P"$pdir"
+ dpkg-gencontrol -p$pname -P"$pdir"
dpkg --build "$pdir" ..
}
@@ -83,6 +47,38 @@ fwpackagename=linux-firmware-image
kernel_headers_packagename=linux-headers-$version
libc_headers_packagename=linux-libc-dev
+# Attempt to find the correct Debian architecture
+case "$UTS_MACHINE" in
+i386|ia64|alpha)
+ debarch="$UTS_MACHINE" ;;
+x86_64)
+ debarch=amd64 ;;
+sparc*)
+ debarch=sparc ;;
+s390*)
+ debarch=s390 ;;
+ppc*)
+ debarch=powerpc ;;
+parisc*)
+ debarch=hppa ;;
+mips*)
+ debarch=mips$(grep -q CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN=y .config && echo el) ;;
+arm*)
+ debarch=arm$(grep -q CONFIG_AEABI=y .config && echo el) ;;
+*)
+ echo "" >&2
+ echo "** ** ** WARNING ** ** **" >&2
+ echo "" >&2
+ echo "Your architecture doesn't have it's equivalent" >&2
+ echo "Debian userspace architecture defined!" >&2
+ echo "Falling back to using your current userspace instead!" >&2
+ echo "Please add support for $UTS_MACHINE to ${0} ..." >&2
+ echo "" >&2
+esac
+if [ -n "$KBUILD_DEBARCH" ] ; then
+ debarch="$KBUILD_DEBARCH"
+fi
+
if [ "$ARCH" = "um" ] ; then
packagename=user-mode-linux-$version
fi
@@ -234,8 +230,8 @@ else
Package: $packagename
Provides: linux-image, linux-image-2.6, linux-modules-$version
Suggests: $fwpackagename
-Architecture: any
-Description: Linux kernel, version $version
+Architecture: $debarch
+Description: Linux kernel, version $version on $debarch
This package contains the Linux kernel, modules and corresponding other
files, version: $version.
EOF
@@ -252,15 +248,14 @@ mkdir -p "$destdir"
(cd $objtree; tar -c -f - -T "$objtree/debian/hdrobjfiles") | (cd $destdir; tar -xf -)
ln -sf "/usr/src/linux-headers-$version" "$kernel_headers_dir/lib/modules/$version/build"
rm -f "$objtree/debian/hdrsrcfiles" "$objtree/debian/hdrobjfiles"
-arch=$(dpkg --print-architecture)
cat <<EOF >> debian/control
Package: $kernel_headers_packagename
+Architecture: $debarch
Provides: linux-headers, linux-headers-2.6
-Architecture: $arch
-Description: Linux kernel headers for $KERNELRELEASE on $arch
- This package provides kernel header files for $KERNELRELEASE on $arch
+Description: Linux kernel headers for $KERNELRELEASE on $debarch
+ This package provides kernel header files for $KERNELRELEASE on $debarch
.
This is useful for people who need to build external modules
EOF
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists