[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5hharbxlxf.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 16:31:24 +0200
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>
Cc: Daniel Mack <zonque@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: snd-usb: "delay: estimated 0, actual 352"
At Thu, 6 Sep 2012 15:17:58 +0200,
Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
>
> On 2012.09.06 at 15:08 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > At Thu, 6 Sep 2012 11:43:48 +0200,
> > Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2012.09.06 at 10:21 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > > At Thu, 06 Sep 2012 09:35:26 +0200,
> > > > Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > >
> > > > In short, a patch like below may fix the issue (note: completely
> > > > untested!)
> > >
> > > No it doesn't, unfortunately...
> >
> > OK, I start tracking down the problem a bit more deeply now.
> >
> > The issue happens when the first two URBs are passed to
> > retire_playback_urb(). These are URBs filled before start_endpoints()
> > are set, so they contain actually zero size. Even though these are
> > a sort of dummy packets, the driver still tries to check with the
> > queued delay account, and gives bogus errors.
> >
> > So, essentially the messages are harmless and nothing to worry too
> > much, but surely it doesn't look sexy.
> >
> > The patch below should fix the problem. Please give it a try.
>
> Yes, your patch finally fixes the problem.
> Thank you Takashi-san.
Thanks for your quick test!
If Daniel has no objection with that patch, I'm going to merge it.
Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists