[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <5049C1DB020000780009998F@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 08:43:55 +0100
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To: "Matt Fleming" <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Cc: "Vasco Dias" <rafa.vasco@...il.com>,
"Matthew Garrett" <mjg@...hat.com>, <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <cJ-ko@...gloub.eu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, efi: 1:1 pagetable mapping for virtual EFI
calls
>>> On 06.09.12 at 17:47, Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 15:34 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 06.09.12 at 15:15, Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org> wrote:
>> > +
>> > + pgd += i;
>> > + save[i] = *pgd;
>> > + set_pgd(pgd, efi_one_to_one_pgd[i]);
>> > + }
>>
>> Did you, as an alternative, consider switching to a different
>> CR3 instead of copying back and forth?
>
> I did consider it, but I couldn't convince myself whether or not the EFI
> pagetable would need to be manually kept in sync with any other
> pagetables. But now I look at the code a bit harder, it seems that
> should be taken care of automatically. In fact, the tboot code seems to
> do something similar. I'll try that approach.
Actually, I think the copying approach is even broken - what if
multiple threads currently on the same address space want to
invoke a runtime call simultaneously? The first one to get here
would save the right values, but the second one wouldn't.
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists