[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1347004931.4244.112.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 09:02:11 +0100
From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Vasco Dias <rafa.vasco@...il.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cJ-ko@...gloub.eu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, efi: 1:1 pagetable mapping for virtual EFI calls
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 08:40 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 06.09.12 at 19:07, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> > Anyone care to refresh my memory why we can't use the "global"
> > 1:1+kernel map, possibly with some improvements (which would benefit the
> > users of those maps too)? With that I mean initial_page_map on i386 and
> > trampoline_pgd on x86-64...
>
> I don't think you want anything inserted in the low part of those
> (kernel-only) page tables, not even transiently.
There are already things inserted into the low part of those page
tables. In fact, the main purpose is to provide a 1:1 mapping for
realmode code. See machine_real_restart().
I think there's definitely merit to the approach Peter outlined above.
There's a variety of places in arch/x86 where a 1:1 mapping is needed.
It would be good to have a single pagetable that provides this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists