[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50494FC6.3050502@kernel.dk>
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 19:37:10 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>,
linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dm-devel@...hat.com, Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] Block cleanups
On 2012-09-06 17:48, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, guys.
>
> (cc'ing Jens, Alasdair and Neil)
>
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 03:34:54PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
>> Screwed up the bio_reset() patch in the last patch series when I went to edit
>> the description, fixed that here.
>>
>> Only other change is the dm patch - made the front_pad conditional on
>> DM_TYPE_BIO_BASED.
>>
>> Kent Overstreet (8):
>> block: Generalized bio pool freeing
>> block: Ues bi_pool for bio_integrity_alloc()
>> dm: Use bioset's front_pad for dm_rq_clone_bio_info
>> block: Add bio_reset()
>> pktcdvd: Switch to bio_kmalloc()
>> block: Kill bi_destructor
>> block: Consolidate bio_alloc_bioset(), bio_kmalloc()
>> block: Add bio_clone_bioset(), bio_clone_kmalloc()
>
> This series looks good to me now. If someone can ack the dm patch, I
> think it's good to go. Jens, what do you think?
Looks OK to me too. I'll run a quick perf test on this tomorrow, and get
it queued up for 3.7 if it looks fine.
Kent, are to resend 3+5 to me?
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists