[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120907204418.GC16360@google.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 13:44:18 -0700
From: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...hat.com,
Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] Block cleanups
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 07:37:10PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2012-09-06 17:48, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Hello, guys.
> >
> > (cc'ing Jens, Alasdair and Neil)
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 03:34:54PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> >> Screwed up the bio_reset() patch in the last patch series when I went to edit
> >> the description, fixed that here.
> >>
> >> Only other change is the dm patch - made the front_pad conditional on
> >> DM_TYPE_BIO_BASED.
> >>
> >> Kent Overstreet (8):
> >> block: Generalized bio pool freeing
> >> block: Ues bi_pool for bio_integrity_alloc()
> >> dm: Use bioset's front_pad for dm_rq_clone_bio_info
> >> block: Add bio_reset()
> >> pktcdvd: Switch to bio_kmalloc()
> >> block: Kill bi_destructor
> >> block: Consolidate bio_alloc_bioset(), bio_kmalloc()
> >> block: Add bio_clone_bioset(), bio_clone_kmalloc()
> >
> > This series looks good to me now. If someone can ack the dm patch, I
> > think it's good to go. Jens, what do you think?
>
> Looks OK to me too. I'll run a quick perf test on this tomorrow, and get
> it queued up for 3.7 if it looks fine.
Thanks!
> Kent, are to resend 3+5 to me?
You should have it now.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists