linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] mfd: twl: Move PWM driver to PWM framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120907131926.GF29340@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de>
Date:	Fri, 7 Sep 2012 15:19:26 +0200
From:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>
To:	Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
Cc:	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>,
	Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@...com>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] mfd: twl: Move PWM driver to PWM framework

On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 11:11:56AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 09/02/2012 01:40 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > This mini series replaces the twl_has_*() macros by the equivalent
> > standard IS_ENABLED() macro and moves the PWM driver to the PWM
> > framework.
> > 
> > I'll take the second patch through the PWM tree but would like to have
> > some Acked-bys from people that know and have the hardware and can
> > verify that I haven't broken anything.
> 
> All looks good for me but I have one comment for patch 2.

Okay. With that change to patch 2, can I add your Acked-by?

Thierry

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped