[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120907024349.GH26709@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 10:43:52 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
To: Huang Shijie <shijie8@...il.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, alan@...ux.intel.com,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] serial: mxs-auart: put the device in
mxs_auart_probe()
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 10:38:41PM -0400, Huang Shijie wrote:
> We call the get_device() in the mxs_auart_probe().
> For the balance of the reference count, we should put the
> device in the mxs_auart_remove().
>
> Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie <shijie8@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/mxs-auart.c | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/mxs-auart.c b/drivers/tty/serial/mxs-auart.c
> index ea5f888..6898413 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/mxs-auart.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/mxs-auart.c
> @@ -796,6 +796,7 @@ static int __devexit mxs_auart_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> auart_port[pdev->id] = NULL;
>
> + put_device(s->dev);
> clk_put(s->clk);
> free_irq(s->irq, s);
> kfree(s);
So the error path of probe needs function fixing too, right?
--
Regards,
Shawn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists