[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50496084.3090400@freescale.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 10:48:36 +0800
From: Huang Shijie <b32955@...escale.com>
To: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
CC: Huang Shijie <shijie8@...il.com>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<alan@...ux.intel.com>, <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] serial: mxs-auart: put the device in mxs_auart_probe()
于 2012年09月07日 10:43, Shawn Guo 写道:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 10:38:41PM -0400, Huang Shijie wrote:
>> We call the get_device() in the mxs_auart_probe().
>> For the balance of the reference count, we should put the
>> device in the mxs_auart_remove().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie<shijie8@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/tty/serial/mxs-auart.c | 1 +
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/mxs-auart.c b/drivers/tty/serial/mxs-auart.c
>> index ea5f888..6898413 100644
>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/mxs-auart.c
>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/mxs-auart.c
>> @@ -796,6 +796,7 @@ static int __devexit mxs_auart_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> auart_port[pdev->id] = NULL;
>>
>> + put_device(s->dev);
>> clk_put(s->clk);
>> free_irq(s->irq, s);
>> kfree(s);
> So the error path of probe needs function fixing too, right?
>
OK.
Send out the new version right now.
Huang Shijie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists