[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <504A2CD3.9060204@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 11:20:19 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf, ibs: Check syscall attribute flags
On 9/7/12 11:11 AM, David Ahern wrote:
> On 9/7/12 11:07 AM, Robert Richter wrote:
>>> Am I reading this right - if exclude_guest is set then perf_ibs_init
>>> returns -EINVAL?
>>
>> Yes, the hardware does not support this. I will look for a solution
>> which emulates this is software.
>
> ugh, that's exactly we need for Intel: if precise is set, exclude_guest
> must be set.
>
> In perf I would like to set exclude_guest if precise is set -- what I
> mentioned yesterday for the patch https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/20/437.
> With my patch -e cycles:p on AMD will then fail EINVAL.
I see now... intel returns ENOTSUP if exclude_guest is not set, amd
returns EINVAL if it is set.
For the AMD case the fallback_missing_features code kicks in for
perf-top and perf-record; I just need to fix up the pr_debug for that case.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists