linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: da850/omap-l138: Add EVM specific code for VPIF to work

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <504DB28D.3070005@ti.com>
Date:	Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:57:41 +0530
From:	Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To:	Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
CC:	Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.lad@...com>,
	dlos <davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: da850/omap-l138: Add EVM specific code for
 VPIF to work

Hi Prabhakar,

On 9/7/2012 11:04 PM, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com> wrote:

>>> +static struct vpif_subdev_info da850_vpif_capture_sdev_info[] = {
>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_DA850_UI_SD_VIDEO_PORT)
>>
>> You agreed to get rid of these multiple ifdefs but you have not fixed that.
>>
> I have merged the top one, at later stage when we go  ahead and add sensor
> support then we would have require to have define two
> da850_vpif_capture_sdev_info
> so to avoid it I have kept this one.

Lets get to that when we actually add sensor support. It might make
sense then. Right now, there is no reason to have them.

Thanks,
Sekhar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/