linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf, ibs: Check syscall attribute flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 10 Sep 2012 15:07:00 +0200
From:	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
To:	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
CC:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf, ibs: Check syscall attribute flags

On 07.09.12 11:20:19, David Ahern wrote:
> I see now... intel returns ENOTSUP if exclude_guest is not set, amd 
> returns EINVAL if it is set.
> 
> For the AMD case the fallback_missing_features code kicks in for 
> perf-top and perf-record; I just need to fix up the pr_debug for that case.

It is EOPNOTSUP. I preferred returning EOPNOTSUP too. But then I saw
that fallback code is implemented to work mostly with EINVAL. It seems
to be the default answer to a syscall. ;)

There are several pieces of code in perf that implement fallback code,
it's hard to find it all and this already caused some bugs in the
past. I was looking at this to unify it, but it was too much effort.

-Robert

-- 
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/