[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120910201810.409a58ea@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 20:18:10 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@...aro.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
kernel-team@...roid.com, kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/14] tty/serial/core: Introduce poll_init callback
> > What stops a parallel open or close changing ASYNC_INITIALIZED after you
> > test and before you lock ?
>
> Yeah, I should do the whole thing under the mutex.
Can you use test_bit() as well. I'm trying to gradually push all the code
that way so people habitually use set_bit() and we don't get any (more)
races where some compile situations and architectures otherwise create
load to register
register ored with constant
write back
> Not related to this particular issue, but the fact that close() can powerdown
> the hardware is quite bad. Today it is always possible to use open,close
> sequence on /dev/ttyXXXX, and polling would break if close() deinitializes the
> hardware (e.g. via uart_change_pm()).
One of the long term goals of tty_port has always ben to have an object
with the lifetime of the physical port so this kind of thing can be fixed.
> In console= case, serial core handles the issue via uart_console(), checking if
> the port is used for console, preventing it to power down the hardware. We can
> do the same, or make tty_find_polling_driver() refcount individual ports/lines.
> But the issue is orthogonal to this particular patch, although needs to be
> fixed some day.
Agreed - however you'll need a separate refcount than the main tty one
for this, because we still need to do a hangup() on the final "tty" close
even if the hardware is 'pinned' for a debugger.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists