linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] dev_<level> and dynamic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120910205605.GB2406@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:56:06 -0400
From:	Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com>, Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] dev_<level> and dynamic_debug cleanups

On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 06:55:50PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 11:35 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> > If nobody else thinks this patch is better, let's at least add a comment in
> > __dev_printk() and __netdev_printk() to fix dynamic debug, if these are changed.
> 
> Or maybe make dynamic_emit_prefix a public function
> and move the __dynamic_<foo>_printk functions to
> nearby the __<foo>_printk functions so it's easier to
> see that changing one requires the other to change.
> 

ok, that makes sense to me.

Thanks,

-Jason

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/