[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120911063048.GA18072@arwen.pp.htv.fi>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 09:30:50 +0300
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
Cc: 'Grant Likely' <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
'Linus Walleij' <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: samsung: use pr_* instead of printk
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 08:59:11PM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:
> This patch uses pr_* instead of printk.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c | 6 +++---
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
> index ba126cc..e38d990 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
> @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
> #ifndef DEBUG_GPIO
> #define gpio_dbg(x...) do { } while (0)
> #else
> -#define gpio_dbg(x...) printk(KERN_DEBUG x)
> +#define gpio_dbg(x...) pr_debug(x)
> #endif
>
> int samsung_gpio_setpull_updown(struct samsung_gpio_chip *chip,
> @@ -926,10 +926,10 @@ static void __init samsung_gpiolib_add(struct samsung_gpio_chip *chip)
> #ifdef CONFIG_PM
> if (chip->pm != NULL) {
> if (!chip->pm->save || !chip->pm->resume)
> - printk(KERN_ERR "gpio: %s has missing PM functions\n",
> + pr_err("gpio: %s has missing PM functions\n",
> gc->label);
I would rather see dev_* conversion instead.
my 2 cents
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists