[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <001401cd8fe7$a06c6c90$e14545b0$%han@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:35:25 +0900
From: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
To: 'Ryan Mallon' <rmallon@...il.com>
Cc: 'Grant Likely' <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
'Linus Walleij' <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 'Jingoo Han' <jg1.han@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: samsung: use pr_* instead of printk
On Tuesday, September 11, 2012 3:09 PM Ryan Mallon wrote
>
> On 10/09/12 21:59, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > This patch uses pr_* instead of printk.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com> ---
> > drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c | 6 +++--- 1 files changed, 3
> > insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
> > b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c index ba126cc..e38d990 100644 ---
> > a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c @@
> > -45,7 +45,7 @@ #ifndef DEBUG_GPIO #define gpio_dbg(x...) do { } while
> > (0) #else -#define gpio_dbg(x...) printk(KERN_DEBUG x) +#define
> > gpio_dbg(x...) pr_debug(x)
>
> This is a functional change since pr_debug compiles away to nothing
> unless DEBUG is defined, so now you need to define both DEBUG and
> DEBUG_GPIO for this to print.
>
> A better fix would be to just replace calls to gpio_dbg with pr_debug.
>
> ~Ryan
Hi Ryan Mallon,
OK, I will replace gpio_dbg with pr_debug as you mentioned.
Thank you.
Best regards,
Jingoo Han
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists