linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] fuse: allocate req->pages[] dynamically

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87har3w5j6.fsf@tucsk.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
Date:	Wed, 12 Sep 2012 18:49:01 +0200
From:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To:	"Maxim V. Patlasov" <mpatlasov@...allels.com>
Cc:	"fuse-devel\@lists.sourceforge.net" 
	<fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devel\@openvz.org" <devel@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] fuse: allocate req->pages[] dynamically

"Maxim V. Patlasov" <mpatlasov@...allels.com> writes:

> Hi Miklos,
>
> So far as no objections appeared, I'll go ahead and replace fuse req->page with
> req->pagevec. It will point to an array of structs:
>
> struct page_vec {
>     struct page    *pv_page;
>     unsigned int    pv_len;
>     unsigned int    pv_offset;
> };
>
> instead of 'struct page *' as it used to be. It seems to be what you suggested
> in one of your comments. Are you OK about it?

Yes, that's exactly what I was thinking.

Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/