linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] fuse: allocate req->pages[] dynamically

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50532E99.8060507@parallels.com>
Date:	Fri, 14 Sep 2012 17:18:17 +0400
From:	"Maxim V. Patlasov" <mpatlasov@...allels.com>
To:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
CC:	"fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net" <fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devel@...nvz.org" <devel@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] fuse: allocate req->pages[] dynamically

Hi Miklos,

09/12/2012 08:49 PM, Miklos Szeredi пишет:
> "Maxim V. Patlasov" <mpatlasov@...allels.com> writes:
>
>> Hi Miklos,
>>
>> So far as no objections appeared, I'll go ahead and replace fuse req->page with
>> req->pagevec. It will point to an array of structs:
>>
>> struct page_vec {
>>      struct page    *pv_page;
>>      unsigned int    pv_len;
>>      unsigned int    pv_offset;
>> };
>>
>> instead of 'struct page *' as it used to be. It seems to be what you suggested
>> in one of your comments. Are you OK about it?
> Yes, that's exactly what I was thinking.

I've encountered a problem while trying to follow this approach. 
fuse_get_user_pages() passes 'req->pages' to get_user_pages_fast(). 
get_user_pages_fast() and friends are not ready to get a pointer to 
array of page_vec-s from fuse. I can see five ways to solve the problem:

1. Re-work get_user_pages_fast() and friends adding ability to fill 
page_vec array. Too much work. Very ugly. I strongly dislike this way.

2. Allocate a temporary array of page pointers in fuse_get_user_pages() 
to use as argument to get_user_pages_fast(). Ugly and may have 
performance impact. I dislike this way too.

3. Call get_user_pages_fast() for each page (i.e. pass npages == 1 to 
it). Easy to implement but may have performance impact. I'd refrain from it.

4. Keep req->pages 'as is', but add req->page_descs pointing to an array 
of <offset, len> structures. Looks clumsy, straightforward, but quite 
doable.

5. Use a hack in fuse_get_user_pages(): temporarily cast req->pagevecs 
to 'struct page **pages', pass it get_user_pages_fast(), then transform 
the content of req->pagevecs[] to have page pointers stored in proper 
places (like 'for (i=...) pagevecs[i].pv_page = pages[i];').

What do you think?

Btw, thanks a lot for careful review of patch-set. I agree with your 
comments. Next version will have those findings fixed.

Thanks,
Maxim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/