[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120912184815.GC557@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:48:15 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, mingo@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, paulus@...ba.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, namhyung.kim@....com, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:perf/core] perf hists: Introduce perf_hpp for hist period
printing
Em Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 07:26:41PM +0200, Robert Richter escreveu:
> On 09.09.12 01:54:39, tip-bot for Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
> # perf record -e cycles -aq sleep 1 ; perf report -n --sort comm,dso | sed '/%/q;d' ; \
> perf record -e cycles -aq sleep 1 | perf report -n --sort comm,dso | sed '/%/q;d'
> 99.86% 11804 swapper [kernel.kallsyms]
> 91.57% swapper [kernel.kallsyms]
> ^^^^^^
> number of samples missing
>
> Moving and changing the code at the same time make the patch
> unreviewable. So no clue that's the problem here.
Yeah, that was unfortunate (movind and changing), we need to try hard
not to do that...
Anyway, Namhyung, can you take a look at this?
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists