[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1347518888.7471.38.camel@lappyti>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 09:48:08 +0300
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
To: Alex Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>,
Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Anton Vorontsov <cbou@...l.ru>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Leela Krishna Amudala <l.krishna@...sung.com>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences
On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 15:23 +0900, Alex Courbot wrote:
> DT support is actually the main point of power sequences, as outside of the DT
> we can always work the old way and use callbacks. If we were to remove DT
> support, I am not sure this work would still be worth being merged.
Ah, I guess you meant hooks in the driver, not hooks to board files?
Yes, that would work, but if all the hooks do essentially the same
things with just minor modifications like sleep-time, it makes more
sense to have just one piece of code which gets the sequence as data.
Tomi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists