[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120914113212.GD2630@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 13:32:12 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
STEricsson_nomadik_linux@...t.st.com, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com,
arnd@...db.de, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/19] i2c-nomadik: Register sub-devices when passed
via Device Tree
> > Documentation: Device Tree binding information for i2c-nomadik driver
> > (Documentation should go along with the code)
>
> I'm still not too sure about how this benefits anyone. You can ensure
> the documentation is placed in an adjacent patch, so it's just as easy
> to make reference to.
It makes reviewing a lot easier if the documentation what is supposed to
be coded and the actual code are in one place. It also prevents what
happened in this case where the documentation never showed up on the
i2c-list.
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists