linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/19] ARM: ux500: Remove redundant #gpio-cell properties from HREF and Snowball DT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 14 Sep 2012 15:58:13 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	STEricsson_nomadik_linux@...t.st.com, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com,
	arnd@...db.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/19] ARM: ux500: Remove redundant #gpio-cell properties
 from HREF and Snowball DT

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:12:23AM -0700, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> > These properties have no place here as the populated nodes are
>> > not related to GPIO Controllers.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
>>
>> Squash this into the previous patch adding them...
>> I think Arnd already noted.
>
> Well he noted that I'd duplicated the error from the snowball.dts
> file, then rectified in this patch, which is fair enough. However,
> I don't think the snowball.dts fix should be squashed into an HREF
> enablement patch, and I can't find a suitable patch in the patch-
> set where it would really fit. Should I leave the Snowball fix
> separate and just fixup the HREF .dts file to never duplicate the
> anomaly?

No you're right, this should be separate.

I was confused that it was in the same patch set, I would
suggest just sending this one on it's own as a snowball fix
fair and square, and have ARM SoC push it to the -rcs as a
regression fix, but your choice.
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/