linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/19] ARM: ux500: Add nodes for the MSP into the HREF Device Tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:00:50 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	STEricsson_nomadik_linux@...t.st.com, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com,
	arnd@...db.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/19] ARM: ux500: Add nodes for the MSP into the HREF
 Device Tree

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 02:53:45AM -0700, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> > +               msp3: msp@...25000 {
>> > +                       status = "okay";
>> > +               };
>> >         };
>> >  };
>>
>> Does this really "enable" the MSPs as the title claims?
>
> Yes they do.
>
>> Aren's there any kind of bindings needed, not even a
>> register base?
>
> All that information is in the "disabled" node contained in .dtsi file.

Argh it's hard to read DT patches without parsing through all the
.dtsi:s in your head first ...

Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/