[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120917110729.GA1018@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 13:07:29 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: section mismatch for acpi_unmap_lsapic()
* Jerry Snitselaar <dev@...tselaar.org> wrote:
> Commit 13ad20c1 "x86 cpu_hotplug: unmap cpu2node when the cpu is
> hotremoved" in linux-next added code to acpi_unmap_lsapic() that
> causes section mismatch warnings:
>
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x694f2): Section mismatch in reference from the function acpi_unmap_lsapic()
> to the function .cpuinit.text:numa_clear_node()
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x694eb): Section mismatch in reference from the function acpi_unmap_lsapic()
> to the variable .cpuinit.data:__apicid_to_node
>
>
> Does acpi_unmap_lsapic() need a wrapper like the one that was made for
> acpi_map_lsapic() or can it just be annotated __ref ? I guess my
> question is would be there be a reason that the wrapper was created
> for acpi_map_lsapic() instead of just annotating __ref besides
> allowing the code for _apic_map_lsapic() to be dropped when
> HOTPLUG_CPU wasn't configured?
That commit comes from -mm AFAICS. Involved parties Cc:-ed.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists