| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 13:07:29 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> To: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com> Subject: Re: section mismatch for acpi_unmap_lsapic() * Jerry Snitselaar <dev@...tselaar.org> wrote: > Commit 13ad20c1 "x86 cpu_hotplug: unmap cpu2node when the cpu is > hotremoved" in linux-next added code to acpi_unmap_lsapic() that > causes section mismatch warnings: > > WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x694f2): Section mismatch in reference from the function acpi_unmap_lsapic() > to the function .cpuinit.text:numa_clear_node() > WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x694eb): Section mismatch in reference from the function acpi_unmap_lsapic() > to the variable .cpuinit.data:__apicid_to_node > > > Does acpi_unmap_lsapic() need a wrapper like the one that was made for > acpi_map_lsapic() or can it just be annotated __ref ? I guess my > question is would be there be a reason that the wrapper was created > for acpi_map_lsapic() instead of just annotating __ref besides > allowing the code for _apic_map_lsapic() to be dropped when > HOTPLUG_CPU wasn't configured? That commit comes from -mm AFAICS. Involved parties Cc:-ed. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists