[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878vc9s1tr.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:06:16 +0930
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...fusion.mobi>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>,
linux-modules <linux-modules@...r.kernel.org>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] module: wait when loading a module which is currently initializing.
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...fusion.mobi> writes:
>> - if (find_module(mod->name)) {
>> + if ((old = find_module(mod->name)) != NULL) {
>> + if (old->state == MODULE_STATE_COMING) {
>> + /* Wait in case it fails to load. */
>> + mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
>> + err = wait_event_interruptible(module_wq,
>> + finished_loading(mod->name));
>> + if (err)
>> + goto free_arch_cleanup;
>> + goto again;
>
> I wonder if we should indeed retry in case the module failed to load
> or if we should just skip straight to returning the error code. We
> don't have the return code for the failed load, but maybe we can
> fabricate one here.
>
> Thoughts?
Could have different cmdline parameters, or other randomness like
out-of-memory. I think this is safest.
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists