[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5057BC2F.3020008@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 09:11:27 +0900
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: qiuxishi <qiuxishi@...il.com>, <mgorman@...e.de>,
<tony.luck@...el.com>, Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
<qiuxishi@...wei.com>, <bessel.wang@...wei.com>,
<wujianguo@...wei.com>, <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
<kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>, <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
<rientjes@...gle.com>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] memory hotplug: fix a double register section
info bug
2012/09/15 5:14, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2012 20:00:09 +0900
> Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
>>> @@ -187,9 +184,10 @@ void register_page_bootmem_info_node(struct pglist_data *pgdat)
>>> end_pfn = pfn + pgdat->node_spanned_pages;
>>>
>>> /* register_section info */
>>> - for (; pfn < end_pfn; pfn += PAGES_PER_SECTION)
>>> - register_page_bootmem_info_section(pfn);
>>> -
>>> + for (; pfn < end_pfn; pfn += PAGES_PER_SECTION) {
>>> + if (pfn_valid(pfn) && (pfn_to_nid(pfn) == node))
>>
>> I cannot judge whether your configuration is correct or not.
>> Thus if it is correct, I want a comment of why the node check is
>> needed. In usual configuration, a node does not span the other one.
>> So it is natural that "pfn_to_nid(pfn) is same as "pgdat->node_id".
>> Thus we may remove the node check in the future.
>
> yup. How does this look?
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
>
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c~memory-hotplug-fix-a-double-register-section-info-bug-fix
> +++ a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -185,6 +185,12 @@ void register_page_bootmem_info_node(str
>
> /* register_section info */
> for (; pfn < end_pfn; pfn += PAGES_PER_SECTION) {
> + /*
> + * Some platforms can assign the same pfn to multiple nodes - on
> + * node0 as well as nodeN. To avoid registering a pfn against
> + * multiple nodes we check that this pfn does not already
> + * reside in some other node.
> + */
> if (pfn_valid(pfn) && (pfn_to_nid(pfn) == node))
> register_page_bootmem_info_section(pfn);
> }
> _
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists