[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120918222405.GB20285@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 01:24:05 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: Sjur Brændeland <sjurbren@...il.com>,
Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH repost] virtio: don't crash when device is buggy
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 01:57:17PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> writes:
>
> > Because of a sanity check in virtio_dev_remove, a buggy device can crash
> > kernel. And in case of rproc it's userspace so it's not a good idea.
> > We are unloading a driver so how bad can it be?
> > Be less aggressive in handling this error: if it's a driver bug,
> > warning once should be enough.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> >
> > --
> >
> > 3.6 material?
>
> I have already applied, this, but it's not for stable, since it's a
> "theoretical bugfix". That check has been in there forever and noone
> AFAIK has actually struck it.
>
> Cheers,
> Rusty.
Yes but can't malicious userspace trigger this with remoteproc? If yes
it's not a question of whether anyone has struck it since people don't
normally run malicious userspace :)
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists