[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120918060806.GA1459@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 08:08:06 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>
To: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sachin.kamat@...aro.org,
patches@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] pwm: Fix compilation error when CONFIG_PWM is not
defined
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 03:31:46PM +0530, Tushar Behera wrote:
> Add dummy implemention of public symbols for compilation-safe inclusion
> of include/linux/pwm.h file when CONFIG_PWM is not defined.
>
> Reported-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@...aro.org>
> ---
> Changes since v3:
> * Nitpicks
>
> Changes since v2:
> * #if condition for legacy functions modified
> * Reverted layout changes, can be taken up when HAVE_PWM is no longer
> required.
>
> Changes since v1:
> * Incorporated Thierry's suggestions regarding adding dummy function
> implemention for all global functions
> * Reorganized header file to have structure definitions first and then the
> function definitions.
>
> include/linux/pwm.h | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Okay, I've applied this to my for-next branch, with some minor changes.
For one I had to merge it with Alex's managed functions patch. Second I
changed all dummy functions that return a struct pwm_device * to return
ERR_PTR(-ENODEV) instead of NULL because PWM users typically check for
IS_ERR(pwm) and not for NULL.
Thierry
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists