[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1348131088.24539.2.camel@oliverchick-Precision-WorkStation-T3400>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 09:51:28 +0100
From: Oliver Chick <oliver.chick@...rix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
CC: "xen-devel@...ts.xen.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
"konrad.wilk@...cle.com" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Persistent grant maps for xen blk drivers
Ah yes, you're right - rings can accomodate 64 requests. ijc, and myself
got muddled. It also explains the comment in my summary that we only use
the first 60-ish persistent grants!
With multipage rings, this will probably become a function, rather than
a constant. Does that sound sensible?
On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 13:03 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 19.09.12 at 12:51, Oliver Chick <oliver.chick@...rix.com> wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * Maximum number of persistent grants that can be mapped by Dom0 for each
> > + * interface. This is set to be the size of the ring, as this is a limit on
> > + * the number of requests that can be inflight at any one time. 256 imposes
> > + * an overhead of 11MB of mapped kernel space per interface.
> > + */
> > +#define BLKIF_MAX_PERS_REQUESTS_PER_DEV 256
>
> How can this be a fixed number, especially in the context of ring
> size extensions? Iirc, single page rings can accommodate 64
> requests, so I'd guess the number above was observed with a
> 4-page (order 2) ring...
>
> Jan
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists