[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <505AF9F6020000780009C909@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 10:11:50 +0100
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To: "Oliver Chick" <oliver.chick@...rix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@...ts.xen.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
"konrad.wilk@...cle.com" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Persistent grant maps for xen blk
drivers
>>> On 20.09.12 at 10:51, Oliver Chick <oliver.chick@...rix.com> wrote:
> Ah yes, you're right - rings can accomodate 64 requests. ijc, and myself
> got muddled. It also explains the comment in my summary that we only use
> the first 60-ish persistent grants!
>
> With multipage rings, this will probably become a function, rather than
> a constant. Does that sound sensible?
Yes, that's what I was expecting. Whether a separate function/
macro is necessary is unclear, as it's simply __RING_SIZE().
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists