lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120920184751.GA18657@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:47:51 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
	josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
	dhowells@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com,
	fweisbec@...il.com, sbw@....edu, patches@...aro.org
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/23] v2 Improvements to RT response on big
 systems and expedited functions

Hello!

This patch series contains additional improvements to latency for
large systems (beyond those in 3.6), along with improvements to
synchronize_rcu_expedited().  It also fixes one race introduced by the
latency improvements and another that was there to start with (but made
more probable by the latency improvements).  These are in a single
series due to conflicts that would otherwise occur.  The individual
patches are as follows:

1-6.	Move RCU grace-period initialization and cleanup into a kthread:
	1.	Move RCU grace-period initialization into kthread.
	2.	Prevent initialization-time quiescent-state race.
	3.	Allow RCU grace-period initialization to be preempted.
	4.	Move RCU grace-period cleanup into kthread.
	5.	Allow RCU grace-period cleanup to be preempted.
	6.	Break up rcu_gp_kthread() into subfunctions.
7.	Prevent offline CPUs from executing RCU core code.
8.	Provide an OOM handler to allow lazy callbacks to be motivated
	under memory pressure.
9.	Segregate rcu_state fields to improve cache locality
	(Courtesy of Dimitri Sivanich).
10-13.	Move RCU grace-period forcing into a kthread.
	10.	Move quiescent-state forcing into kthread.
	11.	Allow RCU quiescent-state forcing to be preempted.
	12.	Adjust debugfs tracing for kthread-based quiescent-state
		forcing.
	13.	Prevent force_quiescent_state() memory contention.
14.	Control grace-period duration from sysfs.
15.	Make rcutree module parameters visible in sysfs.
16.	Fix day-zero grace-period initialization/cleanup race.
17.	Add random PROVE_RCU_DELAY to provoke initalization races.
18.	Adjust for unconditional ->completed assignment.	
19.	Eliminate signed overflow in synchronize_rcu_expedited().
20.	Reduce synchronize_rcu_expedited() latency.
21.	Simplify quiescent-state detection.
22.	Correctly handle reconfiguring to larger leaf fanout in the
	case of CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_EXACT=y.  (New in this posting.)
23.	Shrink RCU when there is a smaller number of CPUs than the
	kernel was built for (NR_CPUS < nr_cpu_ids) even when the
	leaf fanout did not change.  (New in this posting.)

Changes from v1 (https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/30/171):

o	Incorporated feedback from that posting (thank you Peter, Josh,
	and Lai!).  This involves some serious rebasing, so the patch
	numbers do not match v1.

o	Added patches #22 and #23 above.

							Thanx, Paul

 b/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt         |   43 -
 b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt |   11 
 b/kernel/rcutree.c                    |  970 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
 b/kernel/rcutree.h                    |   28 
 b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h             |  131 +++-
 b/kernel/rcutree_trace.c              |   15 
 6 files changed, 680 insertions(+), 518 deletions(-)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ