linux-kernel - [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/23] rcu: Allow RCU grace-period initialization to be preempted

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1348166900-18716-3-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:47:59 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
	josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
	dhowells@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com,
	fweisbec@...il.com, sbw@....edu, patches@...aro.org,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/23] rcu: Allow RCU grace-period initialization to be preempted

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

RCU grace-period initialization is currently carried out with interrupts
disabled, which can result in 200-microsecond latency spikes on systems
on which RCU has been configured for 4096 CPUs.  This patch therefore
makes the RCU grace-period initialization be preemptible, which should
eliminate those latency spikes.  Similar spikes from grace-period cleanup
and the forcing of quiescent states will be dealt with similarly by later
patches.

Reported-by: Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@...e.de>
Reported-by: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
---
 kernel/rcutree.c |   26 +++++++++++---------------
 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index 0df9aaa..59c528f 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -1028,7 +1028,7 @@ rcu_start_gp_per_cpu(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_dat
 /*
  * Body of kthread that handles grace periods.
  */
-static int rcu_gp_kthread(void *arg)
+static int __noreturn rcu_gp_kthread(void *arg)
 {
 	struct rcu_data *rdp;
 	struct rcu_node *rnp;
@@ -1054,6 +1054,7 @@ static int rcu_gp_kthread(void *arg)
 			 * don't start another one.
 			 */
 			raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rnp->lock);
+			cond_resched();
 			continue;
 		}
 
@@ -1064,6 +1065,7 @@ static int rcu_gp_kthread(void *arg)
 			 */
 			rsp->fqs_need_gp = 1;
 			raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rnp->lock);
+			cond_resched();
 			continue;
 		}
 
@@ -1074,10 +1076,10 @@ static int rcu_gp_kthread(void *arg)
 		rsp->fqs_state = RCU_GP_INIT; /* Stop force_quiescent_state. */
 		rsp->jiffies_force_qs = jiffies + RCU_JIFFIES_TILL_FORCE_QS;
 		record_gp_stall_check_time(rsp);
-		raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock);  /* leave irqs disabled. */
+		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rnp->lock);
 
 		/* Exclude any concurrent CPU-hotplug operations. */
-		raw_spin_lock(&rsp->onofflock);  /* irqs already disabled. */
+		get_online_cpus();
 
 		/*
 		 * Set the quiescent-state-needed bits in all the rcu_node
@@ -1089,15 +1091,9 @@ static int rcu_gp_kthread(void *arg)
 		 * indicate that no grace period is in progress, at least
 		 * until the corresponding leaf node has been initialized.
 		 * In addition, we have excluded CPU-hotplug operations.
-		 *
-		 * Note that the grace period cannot complete until
-		 * we finish the initialization process, as there will
-		 * be at least one qsmask bit set in the root node until
-		 * that time, namely the one corresponding to this CPU,
-		 * due to the fact that we have irqs disabled.
 		 */
 		rcu_for_each_node_breadth_first(rsp, rnp) {
-			raw_spin_lock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */
+			raw_spin_lock_irq(&rnp->lock);
 			rcu_preempt_check_blocked_tasks(rnp);
 			rnp->qsmask = rnp->qsmaskinit;
 			rnp->gpnum = rsp->gpnum;
@@ -1108,17 +1104,17 @@ static int rcu_gp_kthread(void *arg)
 			trace_rcu_grace_period_init(rsp->name, rnp->gpnum,
 						    rnp->level, rnp->grplo,
 						    rnp->grphi, rnp->qsmask);
-			raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs remain disabled. */
+			raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rnp->lock);
+			cond_resched();
 		}
 
 		rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
-		raw_spin_lock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */
+		raw_spin_lock_irq(&rnp->lock);
 		/* force_quiescent_state() now OK. */
 		rsp->fqs_state = RCU_SIGNAL_INIT;
-		raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs remain disabled. */
-		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rsp->onofflock);
+		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rnp->lock);
+		put_online_cpus();
 	}
-	return 0;
 }
 
 /*
-- 
1.7.8

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/