[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <A874F61F95741C4A9BA573A70FE3998F41EF5B1C@DQHE02.ent.ti.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 23:19:07 +0000
From: "Kim, Milo" <Milo.Kim@...com>
To: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@...aro.org>
CC: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4] power_supply: add new lp8788 charger driver
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anton Vorontsov [mailto:anton.vorontsov@...aro.org]
> Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 7:17 AM
> To: Kim, Milo
> Cc: David Woodhouse; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] power_supply: add new lp8788 charger driver
>
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 10:43:21AM +0000, Kim, Milo wrote:
> > TI LP8788 PMU supports regulators, battery charger, RTC,
> > ADC, backlight driver and current sinks.
> >
> > This patch supports the charger operations including
> > the charger interrupt handling.
> [...]
> > Signed-off-by: Milo(Woogyom) Kim <milo.kim@...com>
> > ---
>
> Had to fix a bunch of checkpatch complaints:
>
> CHECK: space prohibited before semicolon
> #478: FILE: drivers/power/lp8788-charger.c:396:
> + for (i = 0 ; i < pdata->num_chg_params ; i++) {
>
> CHECK: space prohibited before semicolon
> #541: FILE: drivers/power/lp8788-charger.c:459:
> + for (i = 0 ; i < pchg->num_irqs ; i++) {
Thanks a lot for this review.
It seems like the result of running checkpatch script with --strict option.
Should I keep this option whenever submitting the file?
I used to run w/o strict option.
>
>
> But other than this, it looks really good, this is now applied.
>
> Obviously, I couldn't compile-test it, but hopefully it will work
> once MFD part is also in. :-) If not, you can just send a follow-up
> fix.
Additionally, lp8788-charger depends on lp8788-adc driver.
I've found wrong calculation on getting the battery voltage and temperature.
I would submit this patch later.
I appreciate your help.
Best Regards,
Milo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists