linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86: xor-block handling adjustments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <505CA3D9020000780009D0DC@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Date:	Fri, 21 Sep 2012 16:28:57 +0100
From:	"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To:	"Suresh Siddha" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc:	<mingo@...e.hu>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86: xor-block handling adjustments

>>> On 10.09.12 at 21:20, Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 13:37 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> 1: unify SSE-base xor-block routines
>> 2: improve XMM register spill/fill
>> 3: add alternative SSE implementation only prefetching once per 64-byte line
>> 4: make virtualization friendly
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
> 
> Jan, There are some relevant changes in tip/x86/fpu branch. Can you
> please build your patches on top of that?

I see (albeit I'm puzzled by the patch there being just 2 days
old, yet your reply was sent over 10 days ago) - I'll probably
re-submit once I merged with the 3.7-rc-s, the more that I
still didn't get anything back from hpa regarding the stack
alignment compiler option he told me about, but use of which
I wasn't able to spot anywhere.

Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/